When I was in college getting a Master degree in Psychology, it hit me one day that everything I am learning, I already knew; I was only learning fancy words for it.
This article I thought was full of changing those fancy new words for even newer fancier words with nothing new really to be learned, that and some propaganda thrown on top like a cherry on a pie.
My rebuttal will be in bold.Scientist seeks to banish evil, boost empathy
http://af.reuters.com/article/southAfricaNews/idAFLDE7430U720110505?sp=true* Psychopathology expert says idea of evil has done no good
* Sees empathy as world's most valuable but ignored resource
By Kate Kelland, Health and Science Correspondent
LONDON, May 5 (Reuters) - Simon Baron-Cohen has been battling with evil all his life.
As a scientist seeking to understand random acts of violence, from street brawls to psychopathic killings to genocide, he has puzzled for decades over what prompts such acts of human cruelty. And he's decided that evil is not good enough.
"I'm not satisfied with the term 'evil'," says the Cambridge University psychology and psychiatry professor, one of the world's top experts in autism and developmental psychopathology.
"We've inherited this word.. and we use it to express our abhorrence when people do awful things, usually acts of cruelty, but I don't think it's anything more than another word for doing something bad. And as a scientist that doesn't seem to me to be much of an explanation. So I've been looking for an alternative -- we need a new theory of human cruelty."
How about a psychopath that does bad things is EVIL? No, I can't sell a book with one page either. Better come up with some fluff...Baron-Cohen, who is also director of the Autism Research Centre at Cambridge, has just written a book in which he calls for a kind of rebranding of evil to offer a more scientific explanation for why people kill and torture, or have such great difficulty understanding the feelings of others.
His proposal is that evil be understood as a lack of empathy -- a condition he argues can be measured and monitored and is susceptible to education and treatment.
NEW THEORY
Baron-Cohen defines empathy in two parts -- as the drive to identify another person's thoughts and feelings, and the drive to respond appropriately to those thoughts and feelings.
It is also, he says, one of the most valuable resources in our world -- one which is currently woefully underused.
"We all have degrees of empathy... but perhaps we are not using it to its full potential," he explained in an interview with Reuters after delivering a lecture in London.
He says erosion of empathy is an important global issue that affects the health of communities, be they small ones like families, or big ones like nations.
If we all used our ability to empathise more, and recognised its value, he says, conflicts such as the decades of tit-for-tat violence between Palestinians and Israelis could be resolved.
We sure got into this subject rather quickly. I don't even know where to begin but I agree, the Israelis should empathize with the Palestinians more, after all they came in and took their land and basically put them in segregation, but really, in a scientific article? Let's move on. "If you think about conflict resolution at the moment, usually we are dependent on diplomatic channels, legal frameworks, or military methods. But all those things operate at a very abstract level and they don't seem to get us very far.
"Empathy is about two people -- two people meeting, getting to know each other and tuning in to what the other person is thinking and feeling."
As an example, Baron-Cohen cites the meeting of minds between Nelson Mandela and the then South African president F. W de Klerk, which helped end apartheid in the early 1990s.
"The progress that came out of just that one relationship -- well, arguably, it broke through where all other methods had failed, and at far less cost in terms of human life," he says.
PSYCHOPATHS HAVE "ZERO DEGREES OF EMPATHY"
While this statement is true, it is also true that a pure psychopath has no feelings of embarrassment, or any other strong emotions. It is not that they do not have empathy, it's that they have no hang-ups about anything they do. Obviously they must retain a feeling of enjoyment somehow for some of the abhorrent things some of them do. They must be getting some reward for their sick behavior.A Jewish upbringing peppered with tales about the horrors of the Nazis' treatment of Jews and other minorities was early motivation for Baron-Cohen to seek to deconstruct human cruelty
He cites times when his father told him how the Nazis turned Jews into lampshades, or into bars of soap, and a tale about the mother of a family friend whose hands had been severed by Nazi scientists who switched them around and sewed them back on again so that her thumbs were on the outside.
If he sites these things, perhaps the author could cite it for us? I googled "sewed hands backwards" and only came up with this article. I'm gonna have to call BS on this entire paragraph until some citation is provided. "Today, almost half a century after my father's revelations...my mind is still exercised by the same single objective: to understand human cruelty," he writes in his book.
I too am curious about such behavior as well as lack of ethics when writing fantastic statements and not including proof. Is it up to the reader to validate the claims made in this article? One could say that is is not very empathetic towards the reader to make them do such research on a topic that is supposedly so well researched in the first place.In the book, entitled "Zero Degrees of Empathy" in Britain, and "The Science of Evil" in the United States, where it comes out in July, Baron-Cohen seeks to pick apart and define components of empathy -- including hormones, genes, environment, nurture, and early childhood experiences.
I'm going to guess.. High testosterone, alcoholic dad not present in upbringing and an abusive mother? I bet I'm in the ballpark.Citing decades of scientific research, he says there are at least 10 regions of the brain which make up what he calls the "empathy circuit". When people hurt others, either systematically or fleetingly, parts of that circuit are malfunctioning.
Baron-Cohen also sets out an "empathy spectrum" ranging from zero to six degrees of empathy, and an "empathy quotient" test, whose score puts people on various points along that spectrum.
Drawing a classic bell curve on a graph, Baron-Cohen says that thankfully, the vast majority of humans are in the middle of the bell curve spectrum, with a few particularly attuned and highly empathetic people at the top end.
I would wager that if one is too "empathetic" they are probably a little neurotic. "Ohh that poor ant I stepped on, poor little bugger, Ohh no! I stepped on another one. I better lock myself inside the house so I dont do that anymore. Ohh there's a fly inside, come little fly, lets go outside with your friends..." I'm being a bit over the top, but I hope you gather my meaning Psychopaths, narcissists, and people with borderline personality disorder sit at the bottom end of the scale -- these people have "zero degrees of empathy".
He is grouping AXIS I disorders with AXIS II disorders here, I just wanted to point that out. I'm not very surprised either, are you?But rather than labelling them as evil, Baron-Cohen says they should be seen as sick, or "disabled", and we should seek to understand why they have such an empathy deficiency and help them replace it.
Baron-Cohen shies away from saying that psychopaths can be "cured" of extreme behaviour, but he argues strongly against locking them up and saying there is nothing society can do.
As long as they do no harm to others in any fashion, I agree, BUT what Mr. Cohen knows and fails to mention is that psychopaths are fully aware of the laws they are breaking and they do not care about any repercussion from that. I'm sure there are thousands of psychopaths that have self control and are working very successfully at sales and perhaps writing about behavioral phenomenon."I try to keep an open mind. I would never want to say a person is beyond help," he explains. "Empathy is a skill like any other human skill -- and if you get a chance to practise, you can get better at it." (Editing by Mark Trevelyan)
END OF ARTICLE
Once again, thanks for taking the time to stop by and read this blog.
Visit My Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/gregalabama
